7/15/2023 0 Comments Fldigi dxkeeperI emailed Rick, N2AMG, and inquired if he could write an interface to Flrig. HRD also does this and there is a DX_Lab_HRD_Bridge, but HRD takes up more real estate on the Desktop. I use it for setting the USB MOD LEVEL in my Icom IC-7300 (which I also do with commander). It also lets you define buttons, like Commander, for specific CAT commands that are not already handled by the program. That is: If you change a setting on the radio it will change on Flrig and vice versa. It also is a two way affair with the radio. It has controls for Power Level, Volume, Squelch, NR, Bandwidth, Mic level and others. Flrig offers much better radio control than Fldigi. If you set the radio in WSJT-X to be Flrig, then JTAlerts feeds DXKeeper, Pathfinder, DXView and Spotcollector the pertinent informatioin. Try using WSJt-X + JTAlerts + Flrig with DXKeeper etal. + If you're not using SpotCollector, you're missing much of the functionality that DXLab uniquely provides for DXers seeĬan complete radio control be accomplish with Commander as is with FLRig? + DXLab applications rely on Commander for access to your transceiver's frequency, mode, split, RX/TX status, etc. I can also monitor the S meter, radio SWRs and Power output with FLRig.īy not having Commander running, does this impact performance of the DXLab Suite? I am able to have complete control over radio functions including auto-tuning without touching the radio. Within WSJT-X → Setting → Radio → I choose FLRig FLRig as my Rig control. I also use Flrig to control my radio when using both program. I use DXKeeper as my one and only logging program. In those two configurations Commander replaces FLrig as the rig control Obtained with WSJT-X/Commander/SpotCollector and FLdig plus the FLdigi. + No.The same capabilities as WSJT-X/FLrig and FLDIGI/FLRig can generally be Can complete radio control be accomplish with Commander as is with
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |